Search for: "Glass v. US" Results 1 - 20 of 1,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 1:28 pm
BBP admitted copying its outer profile exactly: the glass only differed in its internal dimensions because BBP used plastic of a different thickness to the Aspen’s glass. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:50 am by Walter Olson
As we have seen in earlier coverage, automakers will get sued over some kinds of accident if they decide to use laminated glass, and sued over others if they decide to use nonlaminated glass. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am by Randall Holbrook
A manufacturer of chemically strengthened glass sold under the IONEX mark failed to show that Apple’s use of the term Ion-X to describe the glass on the Apple Watch was infringing. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Marty Schwimmer
THIS AMERICAN LIFE v THIS AMERICAN STARTUP, both used in relation to, among other things, podcasts. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 6:45 am by Eric Bangeman
New Willow Glass is rollable and paper-thin: Glass could be used for lighting and solar cells as well as smartphones. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel Gilman
  Here’s a wrinkle: the staff do seem to be building on their experience regarding the use of noncompete terms in the glass container industry. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision in this case, please use this link: Matter of Ohrenstein v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court most recently stressed, in 2005’s Volvo v. [read post]